One of our key material matters is to create sustainable value for all our stakeholders and integrate sustainable development into strategy, governance, management, and reporting, with the strategic objective of reducing our negative impact on the environment. Our financial strategy is to grow through acquisitions and the leveraging of the existing portfolio by maximising the net asset base and improving cash generation, thereby growing income sustainably and managing costs.
We exist to empower previously disadvantaged individuals through job creation and maximising shareholder wealth generation through strategic investments
Our vision is to be a dynamic and innovative company that creates superior stakeholder value
The economy is still reeling from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and trading conditions such as lower business confidence, supply shortages, load shedding, inflationary pressures, foreign exchange volatility, civil unrest, the high cost of fuel, flooding, poverty, high unemployment, and the recent Ukraine-Russia war affected major supply industries. Economic recovery is likely to be slow across all markets and would require significant investment to stimulate growth. Our Group operated within this context in addition to unique challenges as the banking issues we currently face. It was our focus to stabilise the business within this tough context and preserve value for all our stakeholders.
The health, safety, and well-being – including the mental health of employees and “the new way of work” – remain a key priority for us.
During the year, the Board had to review its operational plans towards achieving its strategy and objectives, identifying crucial focus areas, and modernising our infrastructure.
Our executive management was responsible for developing and refining the Company’s strategy, in collaboration with the Board, through observing the volatile Macroeconomic environment and regularly assessing the short- to medium term impact on our business. This included evaluating external factors, liquidity of our clients, our cash requirements, and ways to contain costs. In addition, executive management was responsible for implementing the strategy with the Board’s oversight. The strategy includes the impact on the six capitals, the risks and opportunities facing the Company, and how the strategy is underpinned by the principles of sustainability and stewardship.
Our report extends beyond financial reporting and includes non-financial performance, opportunities, risks, and outcomes attributable to or associated with our key stakeholders. Our financial performance is a result of how we interacted with all our various stakeholders.
The Group had challenges in its relationship with banking institutions, and we engaged with banking institutions in this regard and kept all our stakeholders abreast of developments in these engagements. We maintained communication with the JSE on listing and regulatory issues throughout the year, seeking their advice on transactions and responding to any concerns raised.
Our engagement with suppliers enabled us to ensure consistent delivery of products and services and better manage our working capital through negotiated terms. We also supported our suppliers by making payments on time. Our clients partnered with us and ensured that they paid us on time, which helped us manage our liquidity. Our commitment to creating strong bonds with our stakeholders based on mutual respect and understanding remains unwavering.
Through our various operations, we will continue to explore opportunities to maximise our Group’s capital and operational efficiencies and play our part in creating long-term stakeholder value.
The 2022 financial year was characterised by uncertain geopolitical and socioeconomic growth factors, a challenging operating environment, evolving stakeholder needs and low growth, which has impacted our strategy. Our materiality process includes identifying, assessing, compiling, prioritising, deliberating, applying and validating our material matters and developments that have the potential to impact our sustainability.
MATERIAL MATTER | IMPACT ON OUR STRATEGY |
OUTCOMES | RISKS AND CHALLENGES | CAPITAL AFFECTED |
---|---|---|---|---|
FINANCIAL |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
THE ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL AND RELATIONSHIP CAPITAL |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
BUSINESS OPERATIONS AND HUMAN CAPITAL |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HUMAN CAPITAL AND SOCIAL AND RELATIONSHIP CAPITAL |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
CHALLENGING OUTLOOK | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Our risk management process is designed to identify, assess, quantify, and mitigate events by providing reasonable assurance that our strategic objectives will be achieved through the risk’s potential positive and negative effects.
Our risk management approach continues to evolve as we define risks that may impact our ability to deliver sustainable value for our stakeholders. Our value creation strategy depends on management being able to leverage opportunities and the associated risks without jeopardising the direct interests of our stakeholders.
As new trends and developments shape the Macroeconomic environment, our themes have remained consistent but have been amended to reflect the pressure on revenue, the depressed economic climate, slow economic recovery, heightened cyber risk, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, and increased banking challenges to ensure organisational resilience.
Our Board delegated the management of risks to the Audit and Risk Committee and is committed to effective risk management to pursue the Group’s strategic objectives to grow shareholder value sustainably. In our material matters, our key risks and opportunities represent the issues that impact our ability to create sustainable value for our stakeholders.
A key responsibility of the Audit and Risk Committee is to review the top material risks that the Group faces, respond to new and emerging risks, and ensure alignment with regulatory changes and best practices. In doing so, the committee takes stakeholder needs into account, including corporate governance principles, risk trends, global trends, and external dynamics. With our sound risk management, we can anticipate and respond to operating changes and make decisions under conditions of uncertainty.
RISK AND RATIONALE |
CONSEQUENCES | MITIGATION | OPPORTUNITIES | LINK TO MATERIAL MATTER/ STRATEGY |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Lack of access to banking facilities |
The relationship of the Group with banking institutions has been strained and has culminated in some bank account closures. If this continues there is a risk of:
|
|
Diversification of banking facilities to less traditional mainstream banks. Engage with banking institutions more robustly to re-establish a strong relationship which lays a foundation for long-term partnership. |
![]() ![]() |
2 | Loss of support from stakeholders due to reputational damage |
As a Company that is in the public eye there is a risk that stakeholders may cease supporting the Company due to negative media articles, perceived governance implementation failures and bank account closures. This would result in:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
3 | Loss of business demand due to the economic recession, tarnished reputation and the negative impact of COVID-19 |
The economic recession in local and international markets and the uncertain economic climate and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic as we enter the third year and return business recovery to pre-COVID-19 levels could result in:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | Non-compliance with regulatory requirements resulting in fines and penalties |
The ever-changing regulatory environment could result in inadequate controls and processes. Inadequate monitoring and response to the requirements of the applicable legislation could result in:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
5 | Inability to raise funding due to reputational damage and economic downturn |
The negative reputation that the Company is currently under in addition to the economic downturn could result in:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | Business interruption due to information technology systems downtime or breaches |
There is potential for downtime and security breaches due to inadequate IT integration into strategy, outdated systems, lack of knowledge by employees and undefined reliance on third party IT service provides. This could result in:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
7 | Loss of critical skills due to reputational damage and the competitive job market |
Limited investment in scarce skills and programmes, inadequate skills transfer and limited training opportunities focussed on technical skills, inadequate succession planning, negative brand reputation and non-competitive employee incentive schemes could result in employees looking at other opportunities resulting in:
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
8 | Inability to respond adequately to environmental challenges such as climate change |
Being the controlling shareholder of a fishing company and other large companies in various sectors with the potential for a significant carbon footprint, there is a risk that our response to these challenges could be inadequate resulting in:
|
|
|
![]() |
RISK SCORE | RISK MAGNITUDE | RESPONSE |
---|---|---|
16–25 | High | Unacceptable level of risk – High level of control intervention required to achieve an acceptable level of residual risk |
8–15 | Medium | Unacceptable level of risk, except under unique circumstances or conditions – Moderate level of control intervention required to achieve an acceptable level of residual risk |
1–7 | Low | Mostly acceptable – Low level of control intervention required if any |
© Copyright 2022 AEEI